Graham Brodie KC 

Graham Brodie KC 

Call | 1989 

Silk | 2013

Expertise

Expertise

Graham Brodie KC 

Call | 1989 

Silk | 2013

Expertise

Graham Brodie KC is amongst the leading silks at the Bar practising in cross-over work in civil and criminal litigation arising out of allegations of financial and commercial wrongdoing.  He is equally comfortable acting in:
 
Heavy commercial litigation involving allegations of misconduct e.g. Unik Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SÀRL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594 , appellate litigation following the non-redemption of bonds; FCA v Papadimitrakopoulos [2023] Ch 101, a claim for statutory damages for market abuse withdrawn by the FCA following Graham’s application for an order striking out the proceedings as abusive; and Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] 4 WLR 88, in which Graham acted for fiduciaries in an $850 million claim to set aside transactions prejudicing creditors;
 
Allegations of serious commercial crime e.g. R v Mason (2024) in which Graham represented the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges in an SFO prosecution for participation in bribes paid on behalf of a subsidiary of Airbus to ensure the continuation of orders for the provision of military telecommunications equipment to the Saudi Arabian National Guard;
 
Asset recovery claims under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 e.g. the ongoing claim by the DPP for the recovery of 61,000 BTC, which is currently worth USD 5 billion, emanating from a Ponzi fraud in China in which Graham acts for over 4,000 Chinese victims claiming an interest in the seized funds; and

Public law challenges e.g. R (River East Supplies Ltd) v Crown Court at Nottingham [2017] 4 WLR 135 in which Graham acted in a judicial review challenge to a production order issued pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the United States (and followed a successful judicial review challenge to a search warrant issued in the same investigation).

Read More

Graham Brodie KC is amongst the leading silks at the Bar practising in cross-over work in civil and criminal litigation arising out of allegations of financial and commercial wrongdoing.  He is equally comfortable acting in:
 
Heavy commercial litigation involving allegations of misconduct e.g. Unik Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SÀRL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594 , appellate litigation following the non-redemption of bonds; FCA v Papadimitrakopoulos [2023] Ch 101, a claim for statutory damages for market abuse withdrawn by the FCA following Graham’s application for an order striking out the proceedings as abusive; and Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] 4 WLR 88, in which Graham acted for fiduciaries in an $850 million claim to set aside transactions prejudicing creditors;
 
Allegations of serious commercial crime e.g. R v Mason (2024) in which Graham represented the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges in an SFO prosecution for participation in bribes paid on behalf of a subsidiary of Airbus to ensure the continuation of orders for the provision of military telecommunications equipment to the Saudi Arabian National Guard;
 
Asset recovery claims under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 e.g. the ongoing claim by the DPP for the recovery of 61,000 BTC, which is currently worth USD 5 billion, emanating from a Ponzi fraud in China in which Graham acts for over 4,000 Chinese victims claiming an interest in the seized funds; and

Public law challenges e.g. R (River East Supplies Ltd) v Crown Court at Nottingham [2017] 4 WLR 135 in which Graham acted in a judicial review challenge to a production order issued pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the United States (and followed a successful judicial review challenge to a search warrant issued in the same investigation).

Read More

Graham Brodie KC is amongst the leading silks at the Bar practising in cross-over work in civil and criminal litigation arising out of allegations of financial and commercial wrongdoing.  He is equally comfortable acting in:
 
Heavy commercial litigation involving allegations of misconduct e.g. Unik Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SÀRL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594 , appellate litigation following the non-redemption of bonds; FCA v Papadimitrakopoulos [2023] Ch 101, a claim for statutory damages for market abuse withdrawn by the FCA following Graham’s application for an order striking out the proceedings as abusive; and Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] 4 WLR 88, in which Graham acted for fiduciaries in an $850 million claim to set aside transactions prejudicing creditors;
 
Allegations of serious commercial crime e.g. R v Mason (2024) in which Graham represented the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges in an SFO prosecution for participation in bribes paid on behalf of a subsidiary of Airbus to ensure the continuation of orders for the provision of military telecommunications equipment to the Saudi Arabian National Guard;
 
Asset recovery claims under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 e.g. the ongoing claim by the DPP for the recovery of 61,000 BTC, which is currently worth USD 5 billion, emanating from a Ponzi fraud in China in which Graham acts for over 4,000 Chinese victims claiming an interest in the seized funds; and

Public law challenges e.g. R (River East Supplies Ltd) v Crown Court at Nottingham [2017] 4 WLR 135 in which Graham acted in a judicial review challenge to a production order issued pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the United States (and followed a successful judicial review challenge to a search warrant issued in the same investigation).

Read More

Graham Brodie KC is amongst the leading silks at the Bar practising in cross-over work in civil and criminal litigation arising out of allegations of financial and commercial wrongdoing.  He is equally comfortable acting in:
 
Heavy commercial litigation involving allegations of misconduct e.g. Unik Bond SA v Catbalogan Holdings SÀRL [2025] EWCA Civ 1594 , appellate litigation following the non-redemption of bonds; FCA v Papadimitrakopoulos [2023] Ch 101, a claim for statutory damages for market abuse withdrawn by the FCA following Graham’s application for an order striking out the proceedings as abusive; and Akhmedova v Akhmedov and others [2021] 4 WLR 88, in which Graham acted for fiduciaries in an $850 million claim to set aside transactions prejudicing creditors;
 
Allegations of serious commercial crime e.g. R v Mason (2024) in which Graham represented the only defendant to be acquitted of all charges in an SFO prosecution for participation in bribes paid on behalf of a subsidiary of Airbus to ensure the continuation of orders for the provision of military telecommunications equipment to the Saudi Arabian National Guard;
 
Asset recovery claims under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 e.g. the ongoing claim by the DPP for the recovery of 61,000 BTC, which is currently worth USD 5 billion, emanating from a Ponzi fraud in China in which Graham acts for over 4,000 Chinese victims claiming an interest in the seized funds; and

Public law challenges e.g. R (River East Supplies Ltd) v Crown Court at Nottingham [2017] 4 WLR 135 in which Graham acted in a judicial review challenge to a production order issued pursuant to a request for mutual legal assistance from the United States (and followed a successful judicial review challenge to a search warrant issued in the same investigation).

Read More

White Collar, Crime and Investigations

White Collar, Crime and Investigations

POCA & Asset Recovery

POCA & Asset Recovery

Financial Crime

Financial Crime

Commercial Dispute Resolution

Commercial Dispute Resolution

Commercial Dispute Resolution

Fraud & Asset Recovery  

Fraud & Asset Recovery  

Judicial Review 

Judicial Review 

For enquiries please contact our clerks

For enquiries please

contact our clerks

For enquiries

please contact
our clerks

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.” | Legal 500

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.” | Legal 500

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases” | Chambers & Partners

12:20

BVI

11:20

Cayman Islands

20:20

Dubai

00:20

Hong Kong

16:20

London

19:20

Qatar

00:20

Singapore

11:20

Cayman Islands

16:20

London

12:20

BVI

19:20

Qatar

20:20

Dubai

00:20

Singapore

00:20

Hong Kong

12:20

BVI

11:20

Cayman Islands

20:20

Dubai

00:20

Hong Kong

16:20

London

19:20

Qatar

00:20

Singapore