Commercial Dispute Resolution

International Arbitration

a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop
a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop

We have specialist expertise as Counsel in all aspects of international commercial arbitration and investment treaty arbitration – from initial advice, commencement of the arbitration, drafting written submissions, conduct and management of the arbitration, specialist advocacy in all procedural and evidentiary hearings, cost submissions, challenges to the award, to international enforcement of the award. 

Members have extensive global experience of institutional and ad hoc arbitrations conducted under a variety of procedural laws and rules, including, all of the leading arbitral institutions such as ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, LMAA, DIAC, AAA and ad hoc arbitrations, including UNCITRAL, conducted across multiple jurisdictions including Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia Pacific, Caribbean and CIS.

Members also have extensive global experience of investment treaty arbitrations conducted under ICSID, as well as under many Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) and Multilateral Investment Treaties (MITs). One of our members was involved in the first ICSID investment treaty arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty – AES v Republic of Hungary.
We also have expertise as international arbitrators, with some of our arbitration counsel being appointed to the leading arbitrator panels such as ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC, SCCR, and DIAC.

Our arbitration expertise predominately covers commercial and corporate disputes, across multiple sectors including energy and natural resources, oil & gas, construction & infrastructure, financial, technology, private equity, real estate, sports, and telecommunications.

Where there are issues of fraud, dishonesty, bribery and corruption, money laundering, proceeds of crime and sanctions that arise, we have specialist members who can advise on these issues. In addition, we are often instructed to enforce arbitral awards in relation to asset recovery proceedings, as well as in situations where a party is seeking an annulment or to challenge an award where there are allegations of fraud or corruption.

Representative cases

View cases

Represented a Balkan State and two government-owned entities in relation to two related LCIA arbitrations arising out of a commercial dispute in connection with a major investment in the tourism sector.

Instructed for Claimant on a private equity arbitration in Asia Pacific. The dispute value amounts to US$50 million.

Represented a petroleum exploration company in an ICC arbitration in connection with a dispute arising out of a production sharing agreement.

Instructed in an arbitration by an international private equity group concerning an investment in Asia Pacific and a dispute under a shareholders’ agreement. The dispute value amounts to US$70 million.

Instructed on a £150 million arbitration joint venture dispute involving hedge fund obligations to develop AI-driven securities finance analytics.

Represented an energy company in an ICC arbitration brought by a former joint venture partner in connection with the termination of the joint venture.

Acting for the respondent in an ad hoc arbitration seated in Mauritius, on an application to the Supreme Court (Designated Court) of Mauritius to challenge the arbitral award on several bases provided for in the Model Law.

Laxmanbhai & Co Ltd v Minaco (Pty) Ltd (ad hoc, Mauritius)

Instructed in an investment arbitration to advise on the expropriation of gold mining assets in an Asia Pacific country. Dispute value of US$1 billion.

Represented a bank and its majority shareholders in an ICSID arbitration against Latvia, alleging breach of a bilateral investment treaty. This matter involved allegations of corruption and attempted extortion against the then Governor of the Central Bank of Latvia and the prudential regulator.

Acting for the successful respondent minority shareholder in PJSC Orient Express Bank, resisting the grant of an anti-suit inunction sought on the basis that court proceedings by the bank were brought in collusion with the shareholder in order to impede arbitrations between the shareholders.

Evison Holdings Ltd v International Co Finvision Holdings

nstructed in a US$275 million oil and gas construction dispute in Asia Pacific.

Acting for the respondent in an arbitration concerning a dispute between a large scale industrial battery supplier / user, and a provider of battery recycling services.

(ICC, London)

Representative cases

View cases

Represented a Balkan State and two government-owned entities in relation to two related LCIA arbitrations arising out of a commercial dispute in connection with a major investment in the tourism sector.

Instructed for Claimant on a private equity arbitration in Asia Pacific. The dispute value amounts to US$50 million.

Represented a petroleum exploration company in an ICC arbitration in connection with a dispute arising out of a production sharing agreement.

Instructed in an arbitration by an international private equity group concerning an investment in Asia Pacific and a dispute under a shareholders’ agreement. The dispute value amounts to US$70 million.

Instructed on a £150 million arbitration joint venture dispute involving hedge fund obligations to develop AI-driven securities finance analytics.

Represented an energy company in an ICC arbitration brought by a former joint venture partner in connection with the termination of the joint venture.

Acting for the respondent in an ad hoc arbitration seated in Mauritius, on an application to the Supreme Court (Designated Court) of Mauritius to challenge the arbitral award on several bases provided for in the Model Law.

Laxmanbhai & Co Ltd v Minaco (Pty) Ltd (ad hoc, Mauritius)

Instructed in an investment arbitration to advise on the expropriation of gold mining assets in an Asia Pacific country. Dispute value of US$1 billion.

Represented a bank and its majority shareholders in an ICSID arbitration against Latvia, alleging breach of a bilateral investment treaty. This matter involved allegations of corruption and attempted extortion against the then Governor of the Central Bank of Latvia and the prudential regulator.

Acting for the successful respondent minority shareholder in PJSC Orient Express Bank, resisting the grant of an anti-suit inunction sought on the basis that court proceedings by the bank were brought in collusion with the shareholder in order to impede arbitrations between the shareholders.

Evison Holdings Ltd v International Co Finvision Holdings

nstructed in a US$275 million oil and gas construction dispute in Asia Pacific.

Acting for the respondent in an arbitration concerning a dispute between a large scale industrial battery supplier / user, and a provider of battery recycling services.

(ICC, London)

Representative cases

Represented a Balkan State and two government-owned entities in relation to two related LCIA arbitrations arising out of a commercial dispute in connection with a major investment in the tourism sector.

Instructed for Claimant on a private equity arbitration in Asia Pacific. The dispute value amounts to US$50 million.

Represented a petroleum exploration company in an ICC arbitration in connection with a dispute arising out of a production sharing agreement.

Instructed in an arbitration by an international private equity group concerning an investment in Asia Pacific and a dispute under a shareholders’ agreement. The dispute value amounts to US$70 million.

Instructed on a £150 million arbitration joint venture dispute involving hedge fund obligations to develop AI-driven securities finance analytics.

Represented an energy company in an ICC arbitration brought by a former joint venture partner in connection with the termination of the joint venture.

Acting for the respondent in an ad hoc arbitration seated in Mauritius, on an application to the Supreme Court (Designated Court) of Mauritius to challenge the arbitral award on several bases provided for in the Model Law.

Laxmanbhai & Co Ltd v Minaco (Pty) Ltd (ad hoc, Mauritius)

Instructed in an investment arbitration to advise on the expropriation of gold mining assets in an Asia Pacific country. Dispute value of US$1 billion.

Represented a bank and its majority shareholders in an ICSID arbitration against Latvia, alleging breach of a bilateral investment treaty. This matter involved allegations of corruption and attempted extortion against the then Governor of the Central Bank of Latvia and the prudential regulator.

Acting for the successful respondent minority shareholder in PJSC Orient Express Bank, resisting the grant of an anti-suit inunction sought on the basis that court proceedings by the bank were brought in collusion with the shareholder in order to impede arbitrations between the shareholders.

Evison Holdings Ltd v International Co Finvision Holdings

nstructed in a US$275 million oil and gas construction dispute in Asia Pacific.

Acting for the respondent in an arbitration concerning a dispute between a large scale industrial battery supplier / user, and a provider of battery recycling services.

(ICC, London)

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500