White Collar, Crime & Investigations

Crime

a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop
a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop

We act for corporates and individuals including high net worth individuals.

Members are often instructed to defend in high profile and heavyweight serious crime cases, including murder, organised crime (including overseas drug cartels, firearms and armed robberies) terrorism and serious sexual offences. 

Being accused of a criminal offence is one of the most stressful events a person or corporate client can go through, and we understand the significant these proceedings can be both personal and professionally.

Instructing a highly reputable and skilled counsel team at the outset is crucial. You are our priority. We are here to resolve your issues and strive to ensure the outcome is much better for you, as a client.

Representative cases

View cases

Legionnaires disease outbreak.

R v Barrow Council and Beckingham.

Murder of naval officer run over by his own car in a burglary.

R v Gibbons & othrs.

Successful appeal against sentence for well-known footballer / manager convicted of drink-driving offences.

R v Dean Saunders.

Successful appeal against sentence – drugs conspiracy.

R v Mahmood [2018] EWCA Crim 2746

Eight defendants stood trial in the ‘Al-Qaeda fundraising’ trial. The case involved careful consideration of the permitted parameters of free speech and the right to manifest religious belief.

R v Muhid & Others

Led in a high profile ‘Article 2’ jury inquest.

In this high-profile case, a serving British soldier was alleged to have imported more than 30 kilograms of cannabis into the UK whilst on leave. The trial involved a cut-throat defence with a fellow serving soldier who was suffering with PTSD following deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan.

R v Rogers & Another

The defendant stood trial accused of playing a central role in the production of a massive quantity of crack cocaine. The trial necessitated the analysis of a huge amount of surveillance and scientific evidence. The defendant was acquitted on every count.

R v Mansaram & Others

Conspiracy to import a significant volume of cannabis using Encrochat devices.

R v RK & Ors (2021)

Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox community.

R v Grynhaus.

Complex firearms trial.

R v MA & Ors (2021)

Defending client charged with two counts of encouraging terrorism contrary to section 1 Terrorism Act 2006. Narita’s team instructed a series of experienced expert witnesses to support the client’s mental health defence. Those reports formed the basis of enabling the defence to engage with the prosecution, CPS and Attorney General to successfully resolve the matters in the public and client’s interests, without a trial.

R v E

Representative cases

View cases

Legionnaires disease outbreak.

R v Barrow Council and Beckingham.

Murder of naval officer run over by his own car in a burglary.

R v Gibbons & othrs.

Successful appeal against sentence for well-known footballer / manager convicted of drink-driving offences.

R v Dean Saunders.

Successful appeal against sentence – drugs conspiracy.

R v Mahmood [2018] EWCA Crim 2746

Eight defendants stood trial in the ‘Al-Qaeda fundraising’ trial. The case involved careful consideration of the permitted parameters of free speech and the right to manifest religious belief.

R v Muhid & Others

Led in a high profile ‘Article 2’ jury inquest.

In this high-profile case, a serving British soldier was alleged to have imported more than 30 kilograms of cannabis into the UK whilst on leave. The trial involved a cut-throat defence with a fellow serving soldier who was suffering with PTSD following deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan.

R v Rogers & Another

The defendant stood trial accused of playing a central role in the production of a massive quantity of crack cocaine. The trial necessitated the analysis of a huge amount of surveillance and scientific evidence. The defendant was acquitted on every count.

R v Mansaram & Others

Conspiracy to import a significant volume of cannabis using Encrochat devices.

R v RK & Ors (2021)

Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox community.

R v Grynhaus.

Complex firearms trial.

R v MA & Ors (2021)

Defending client charged with two counts of encouraging terrorism contrary to section 1 Terrorism Act 2006. Narita’s team instructed a series of experienced expert witnesses to support the client’s mental health defence. Those reports formed the basis of enabling the defence to engage with the prosecution, CPS and Attorney General to successfully resolve the matters in the public and client’s interests, without a trial.

R v E

Representative cases

Legionnaires disease outbreak.

R v Barrow Council and Beckingham.

Murder of naval officer run over by his own car in a burglary.

R v Gibbons & othrs.

Successful appeal against sentence for well-known footballer / manager convicted of drink-driving offences.

R v Dean Saunders.

Successful appeal against sentence – drugs conspiracy.

R v Mahmood [2018] EWCA Crim 2746

Eight defendants stood trial in the ‘Al-Qaeda fundraising’ trial. The case involved careful consideration of the permitted parameters of free speech and the right to manifest religious belief.

R v Muhid & Others

Led in a high profile ‘Article 2’ jury inquest.

In this high-profile case, a serving British soldier was alleged to have imported more than 30 kilograms of cannabis into the UK whilst on leave. The trial involved a cut-throat defence with a fellow serving soldier who was suffering with PTSD following deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan.

R v Rogers & Another

The defendant stood trial accused of playing a central role in the production of a massive quantity of crack cocaine. The trial necessitated the analysis of a huge amount of surveillance and scientific evidence. The defendant was acquitted on every count.

R v Mansaram & Others

Conspiracy to import a significant volume of cannabis using Encrochat devices.

R v RK & Ors (2021)

Sexual abuse in the ultra-orthodox community.

R v Grynhaus.

Complex firearms trial.

R v MA & Ors (2021)

Defending client charged with two counts of encouraging terrorism contrary to section 1 Terrorism Act 2006. Narita’s team instructed a series of experienced expert witnesses to support the client’s mental health defence. Those reports formed the basis of enabling the defence to engage with the prosecution, CPS and Attorney General to successfully resolve the matters in the public and client’s interests, without a trial.

R v E

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500