White Collar, Crime & Investigations

POCA & Asset Recovery

a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop
a calculator sitting on top of a table next to a laptop

We are regularly instructed to advise at the early stages of an investigation and conduct the investigation as independent counsel or as part of a team. That process will often include assessing the information and situation, provide a report on findings and make necessary recommendations to either resolve which may include reporting to key stakeholders or to (and in cooperation with) the relevant regulatory authority, including if matters proceed to a trial (civil or criminal)

Representative cases

View cases

Requirements to be met by defendant seeking variation of restraint order to pay legal fees when Prosecution allege that defendant has assets hidden out of the jurisdiction.

SFO v X [2005] EWCA Civ 1564 CA

Contested account freezing orders, on behalf of the respondents (Wimbledon MC, May 2020 to 2022).

NCA v Majid & Others

Serious Fraud Office v Saleh [2015] Lloyd’s Rep F.C. 629

Representing the NCA in the first appeal to flow from a contempt conviction for making false statements in PCA 2002 restraint proceedings.

R v ML [2022] Court of Appeal

Acting for the Crown in confiscation proceedings arising from a £266m money laundering operation.

Rex v X

Acting alone, advised the Respondent to account forfeiture proceedings brought by Kent Police, and parallel tax tribunal proceedings against HMRC.

HMRC v X

Asset forfeiture proceedings for the respondent, recently resolved (Westminster Magistrates Court, December 2019-September 2020).

SFO v Shabana Kausar

Representing a private landlord in confiscation proceedings following conviction for planning breaches.

R v Phagura

Dismissing G’s appeal against a decision to make a general civil restraint order [GCRO] and the refusal to set it aside.

Gopee v Southwark Crown Court [2023] EWCA Civ 881

Currently instructed by the Financial Conduct Authority as sole POCA counsel on two separate confiscation investigations, as well as related cash forfeiture proceedings.

Operations X & Y

Sinclair v Glatt [2009] 1 WLR 1845

Acting for an offshore SPV in an important case concerning the true scope of the POCA legislation, and in particular establishing that disputes about corporate personality / the corporate veil, and about beneficial ownership of property, fall to be dealt with in accordance with the general law including as to sham trusts, and resulting and constructive trusts.

RCPO v Larkfield Ltd

Representative cases

View cases

Requirements to be met by defendant seeking variation of restraint order to pay legal fees when Prosecution allege that defendant has assets hidden out of the jurisdiction.

SFO v X [2005] EWCA Civ 1564 CA

Contested account freezing orders, on behalf of the respondents (Wimbledon MC, May 2020 to 2022).

NCA v Majid & Others

Serious Fraud Office v Saleh [2015] Lloyd’s Rep F.C. 629

Representing the NCA in the first appeal to flow from a contempt conviction for making false statements in PCA 2002 restraint proceedings.

R v ML [2022] Court of Appeal

Acting for the Crown in confiscation proceedings arising from a £266m money laundering operation.

Rex v X

Acting alone, advised the Respondent to account forfeiture proceedings brought by Kent Police, and parallel tax tribunal proceedings against HMRC.

HMRC v X

Asset forfeiture proceedings for the respondent, recently resolved (Westminster Magistrates Court, December 2019-September 2020).

SFO v Shabana Kausar

Representing a private landlord in confiscation proceedings following conviction for planning breaches.

R v Phagura

Dismissing G’s appeal against a decision to make a general civil restraint order [GCRO] and the refusal to set it aside.

Gopee v Southwark Crown Court [2023] EWCA Civ 881

Currently instructed by the Financial Conduct Authority as sole POCA counsel on two separate confiscation investigations, as well as related cash forfeiture proceedings.

Operations X & Y

Sinclair v Glatt [2009] 1 WLR 1845

Acting for an offshore SPV in an important case concerning the true scope of the POCA legislation, and in particular establishing that disputes about corporate personality / the corporate veil, and about beneficial ownership of property, fall to be dealt with in accordance with the general law including as to sham trusts, and resulting and constructive trusts.

RCPO v Larkfield Ltd

Representative cases

Requirements to be met by defendant seeking variation of restraint order to pay legal fees when Prosecution allege that defendant has assets hidden out of the jurisdiction.

SFO v X [2005] EWCA Civ 1564 CA

Contested account freezing orders, on behalf of the respondents (Wimbledon MC, May 2020 to 2022).

NCA v Majid & Others

Serious Fraud Office v Saleh [2015] Lloyd’s Rep F.C. 629

Representing the NCA in the first appeal to flow from a contempt conviction for making false statements in PCA 2002 restraint proceedings.

R v ML [2022] Court of Appeal

Acting for the Crown in confiscation proceedings arising from a £266m money laundering operation.

Rex v X

Acting alone, advised the Respondent to account forfeiture proceedings brought by Kent Police, and parallel tax tribunal proceedings against HMRC.

HMRC v X

Asset forfeiture proceedings for the respondent, recently resolved (Westminster Magistrates Court, December 2019-September 2020).

SFO v Shabana Kausar

Representing a private landlord in confiscation proceedings following conviction for planning breaches.

R v Phagura

Dismissing G’s appeal against a decision to make a general civil restraint order [GCRO] and the refusal to set it aside.

Gopee v Southwark Crown Court [2023] EWCA Civ 881

Currently instructed by the Financial Conduct Authority as sole POCA counsel on two separate confiscation investigations, as well as related cash forfeiture proceedings.

Operations X & Y

Sinclair v Glatt [2009] 1 WLR 1845

Acting for an offshore SPV in an important case concerning the true scope of the POCA legislation, and in particular establishing that disputes about corporate personality / the corporate veil, and about beneficial ownership of property, fall to be dealt with in accordance with the general law including as to sham trusts, and resulting and constructive trusts.

RCPO v Larkfield Ltd

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500

For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

For enquiries please contact our clerks

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”

  • Chambers & Partners

“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”

  • Legal 500